Governance and accountability

Clear accountability is part of delivering an institutional service. IESG distinguishes responsibility for company commitments, project delivery, information handling and decisions made by external organisations.

Responsibility for company commitments

INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION SERVICES GROUP LTD is responsible for commitments it accepts in its own name. An engagement must identify the contracting party and the person authorised to confirm its scope and commercial arrangements.

We identify the organisation responsible when describing a platform rule, partner role or certification decision. Each organisation retains its own responsibilities, including where communication is coordinated through a shared channel.

Company information · Organisation and relationships

Approving the work

Before accepting work, we review the scope against the information, competence, capacity and authorisation required. The engagement record sets out the deliverables, institutional inputs and material dependencies.

Changes to scope, fees, responsibilities or delivery arrangements require a recorded agreement. The agreed scope remains the reference until a change is accepted; an external authority's requirements remain subject to its own process.

Project responsibility and oversight

Each engagement identifies a service contact and a client contact. Their responsibilities include coordinating information, recording important decisions and bringing issues to the attention of someone able to resolve them.

Delivery arrangements include a route for escalating matters beyond the assigned person's competence or authority. Review is proportionate to the work and addresses material errors before an output is released for its intended use.

Interests that may affect the work

We consider relevant employment, commercial, advisory and referral interests when assigning work. Depending on the interest, controls include disclosure, restricted access, reassignment or declining the activity.

For an ICEQC-related engagement, the support role must remain distinguishable from the certification functions reserved to ICEQC. Any case-specific restriction takes precedence over an ordinary commercial workflow.

Conflicts and referrals · ICEQC roles and independence

Personnel and external service providers

The engagement identifies external contributions material to delivery. Before a contributor begins, we establish the work assigned, permitted use of institutional information and responsibility for the output.

An external contributor's professional credentials do not automatically extend the authority of IESG. Likewise, becoming an IESG delivery partner does not confer an independent organisation's authorisation or approval.

Service concerns and escalation

Clients and other affected people can raise a concern about IESG's services, communications or conduct. The complaint route explains the information needed, review arrangements and how to ask for a further consideration of the response.

A concern about an external organisation's decision must reach the body entitled to address it. We distinguish those routes so that a person does not lose the opportunity to use the appropriate procedure.

Raise a service concern

Information responsibility

We organise and handle engagement records for their agreed purpose, with access limited to the people who need them. The institution remains responsible for the accuracy and authority of the information it supplies; IESG is responsible for handling it within its agreed role.

Requests concerning personal information have a separate contact route. Information about the use of this website and enquiry data appears in the Privacy notice.

Privacy notice · Make a privacy request